Tuesday, October 25, 2011

WHAT'S YOUR PLAN - DAN ??

Now that we've all received our  second dose of  political garbage / propaganda from  Team Defruscio- it openly begs the obvious question:  what's your plan  Dan Fiacco?


Dan Fiacco is a  homegrown East Greenbush resident and has lived a  quiet, successful life in almost total anonymity.  He was prodded into running for public office by disgraced former DPW  flunky , E. Chris Defruscio and failed Council  candidate, Mike Cristo. 


While Keith Langley  has had no problem telling the  voting public that he basically has no plan for East Greenbush, and Ed Gilbert really has no clue whether it's Halloween or  Christmas ,  exactly what does  DAN FIACCO have to say ?


The most recent piece of  fabrication suggests that the hometown team of misfits would  be  able to keep  your  town taxes under the 2% tax cap.   HUH ..?? OK , the budget proposed by the current administration did exactly  that !  When the math is done, it  actually works out to be  about 1.05% increase overall.


It is easy to see that  Dan Fiacco really doesn't want anything what so ever to do with running for  elected office.  He hasn't been to a  Town Board meeting in years and since the announcement of his intention to run for political office, has anyone seen him in or around Town Hall?   I didn't think so.


So - again - WHAT IS YOUR PLAN FOR EAST GREENBUSH - DAN  FIACCO?


 We're not interested in Mike Cristos  plan, Ray Mooneys plan, Don Johnsons  plan , nor  Ann Taylors plan.  What does  Dan Fiacco have to say?  


 This  ought to be interesting !

12 comments:

  1. Didn't you get your propaganda mailing this week from the HLT? I understand your confusion. The message changes with each mailing. Throwing pasta at the wall to see if it sticks.

    They do spell out their platform, though. EVERYTHING THE DEMS HAVE DONE!!!

    One thing has me scratching my noggin. WTH do they mean by "Efficiently provide needed town finances"???

    Also, Repos, my quality of life is fine, TYVM.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually, the proposed EGB buget is in excess of 3% for those of us who do not get town water and sewer. So much for the 2% tax cap. No matter what the party, all politicians spin the facts to benefit their position.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'd suggest that the author of this post is way out ahead of his "administration team." McCabe and company hasn't even been able to produce a report on its performance for the 2010 fiscal year. Not even an un-audited compilation. And yet they want to be retained in office in two weeks. The only thing they can plan is to make sure that the financials are not available for review.

    I think Dan is enough of a businessman to be able to handle the kinds of things the current bunch cannot seem to get together.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1132 - suggest whatever your twisted, warped view point makes you suggest! Your losing and its getting desperate over there huh??
    Dan may very well be a nice guy - but as far as handling the day to day business of the Town, not a chance for him or Gilbert !

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dan and Ed could handle day to day Town business just about as well as Ann could handle a job! Enough said....

    ReplyDelete
  6. LOL..ABCDEFG..... You boys just got nailed on PRAYS.... Bet you wish you could write (and spell).

    ReplyDelete
  7. TIMMY! Yup - I'm still here !October 27, 2011 7:23 AM

    No one got "nailed" ! The nasty , mudslinging started over on her blog by the one and only infamous temper - rANNt Taylor! Trying to deflect the blame doesn't bode well with those who suffered ALL the lies and manipulation of the early Cristo/Taylor bullsh*t that was published both on the Times Union and then after he got thrown off there, he started that other blog to keep throwing bias and slander around.
    Get off your high horse- this blog is here to stay- DON'T LIKE IT - DON'T READ IT!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dwight is back up on his soapbox again ! Particularly because family relative Ed Gilbert is running for Town Office !

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anyone read EG Prays? The Addict (his words) says the Dems say a number of negative things about Ann Taylor and others from the Taylor/Cristo blog but doesn't metion all of the negative, untrue, and vicious accusations the Cristo/Taylor blog says about others. The addict complains that the names of the people who run the EG Talks blog are hidden. Yet, the addict hides his name. The addict then tries to chastise Pete Stenson, who I might add, always signs his name and shares his views. Agree or disagree with Pete, he at least tells you who you are dealing with.

    Addict, you talk about fellow soldiers and being a Marine....what are you afraid of....most people know who you are anyway.

    Addict..keep petting Ann and Mike and overlooking the lies and inuendo on their blog and continue to condemn the EG Talks blog and the town Dems if that's what you need to keep you clean.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Imagine that … criticized on an ANONYMOUS blog that doesn't allow ANY comments, let alone dissenting ones!

    Interesting opinions, though. Of course, everyone's entitled to their own, even the anonymous, so how can I criticize?

    He or she is writing what he or she wants. Which is basically what anyone and everyone does.

    One suggestion … EG Prays might consider replacing the "Content Warning" with the opening narration from the Outer Limits:

    "There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission. ... We will control all you that you see and hear. ... "

    Pete Stenson

    ReplyDelete
  11. Its always been - " Do as I say , not as I do" with the Cristo blog. That will NEVER change.

    Good thing Talks is around - people would actually have no vehicle to challenge the b-s coming out of the Kool-Aide camp!

    Thanks to whomever hosts this blog- its appreciated !

    ReplyDelete
  12. keep it tight to worms holeOctober 27, 2011 9:31 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete